![]() I looked briefly at the Editing tools – there is no separate RAW window as there was in OV. I suspect one could get use to using this UI and maybe it is customizable but it is confusing on first look … One also uses that menu to return from the Full Screen view to the view window you last used before going to Full Screen – the magnified view is retained but is not quite as useful in these smaller windows, particularly if you happen to be on a portable computer. I note that one can magnify the view in the Full Screen view by right clicking the mouse to bring up that sub-men. Also I note that in the other four windows the tools are not always in the same location – in the Image Right window some of the tools are to the left of the thumbnails. Well, not really, as the marking and the new grading tools are available in only four of those windows – not in the Full screen view. This is the second difference in that the marking and magnification tools are no longer available in the Slide Show making that tool less useful to me and meaning I have to modify my procedures,īut, I can use one of the five review windows provided, including a full screen view. I frequently use the magnification tool in the slide dhow to examine detail. Next I review the pictures once or twice, using the Slide Show, and select those to be tossed and those to be worked on using the color markers. The first thing I do with OV3 is to use the Slide Show to review the pictures I just downloaded, and here is the first difference with Workspace – with OV3 bringing up the Slide Show is a button on the ribbon menu and with Workspace it is a menu item in the drop down from the tools button. Expanding on my thoughts … When using OV3, I usually upload my Raw files from the camera to the computer using OV3. Maybe version 2.0 ….Īs I wrote I have continued to tinker and these are some notes from those times. I'll read with interest what others think, particularly if you devote more time than I did … since it is on the computer I may tinker with it from time to time and may even change my mind but that appears to be doubtful. ![]() For instance, To navigate a picture file one can use one of five thumbnail directory windows and each works slightly different than the others and are awkward enough to drive me back to OV3 … My Impression is that this software is here for alpha or beta testing and I want to be paid to do that …. I've just downloaded and used the Workspace program and after very little time I would say that this program is not ready for prime time. (I do not want an image data base system ,to organize my file, which is why I never used LR) I can use it if absolutely necessary to do the general PP but it has rather coarse controls and can be awkward … But it has given me the best conversion that I have found and it is usable. I use OV3 to select picture that I will work on, and on rare occasions to adjust the Exposure Compensation, white balance, and/or lens correction. I have been using OV for about 10 years … I use it strictly to convert from Raw to TIFF. Slow, but unspectacular progress, I think. My photos will certainly be managed through the ACDSee DAM tab. However, the lion's share of my output will still go through ACDSee Raw Development and the ACDSee Bit Mapped editor tab. While not perfect, it is a secondary set of tools I could tolerate from time to time. I HATED OV3 and would use it under no circumstances. I can see myself setting this up as a 3rd party editor in ACDSee for those times when I want to use something unique to Olympus Cameras supported by Workspace. You will need A decent Digital Asset Manager if you have a large database, or even something like FastStone if you need more than the bare minimum in photo management. Still no significant photo management tools - VERY bare bones in that regard. For detailed slider control, you may still want a 3rd party program. Workspace is quite a bit better in that regard, but nowhere close to that of ACDSee or Lightroom. I felt they were impossible to use if you needed very fine control. I found the slider controls in OV3 to be VERY sticky. I'll leave it to you to decide about that! It might not be quite as intuitive to a newbie as OV3, I'm not sure. A significant improvement over Olympus viewer, Still a little sluggish compared to the ACDSee titles, but much faster than Olympus Viewer 3 on the same system.Ī lot of surface resemblance to ACDSee and Lightroom, but the controls are rather basic, though better than OV3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |